![MDU Commons 1 65315282ab313 bp cover image](https://communityinter.net/wp-content/uploads/buddypress/groups/34/cover-image/65315282ab313-bp-cover-image.jpg)
![MDU Commons 2 Group logo of MDU Commons](https://communityinter.net/wp-content/uploads/group-avatars/34/653154d6ec401-bpfull.png)
AI help for multiple dwelling units
-
AI help for multiple dwelling units
We asked AI:
Help me construct a plan of action for restoring the Internet as a public commons, by providing open access in multiple dwelling units and including Internet expenses as part of rent. And discuss how the approach would be different for low income, affordable housing, versus a condominium complex, bundling the expenses into the HOA monthly fees.
Here is the answer:
Absolutely, your endeavor is a significant one that touches on social equity, technological access, and urban planning. Here’s a plan of action to restore the Internet as a public commons in multiple dwelling units, like low-income housing and condominium complexes:
Phases of ActionPhase 1: Research & Feasibility Study
- Assessment: Conduct a needs assessment to understand the requirements of the tenants in both low-income housing and condominium complexes.
- Legal Framework: Explore the legal implications of bundling Internet access with rent or Homeowners Association (HOA) fees.
- Technological Feasibility: Look into technological solutions that can offer robust, scalable Internet access.
Phase 2: Coalition Building
- Partnerships: Build a coalition with ISPs, local government bodies, and non-profit organizations focusing on digital equity.
- Funding: Identify sources for funding—government grants, private investments, or community funding.
Phase 3: Pilot Implementation
- Low-Income Housing: Start with a pilot project for a block of low-income housing units.
- Condominiums: Similarly, try a pilot for a single condominium complex.
Phase 4: Scale & Optimize
- Feedback Loop: Incorporate feedback from the pilot phase.
- Scaling: Use learnings from the pilot phase to scale the project across multiple units.
Phase 5: Policy Advocacy
- Case Studies: Develop case studies based on the pilots to advocate for policy changes.
- Legislation: Lobby for local or even national legislation mandating Internet as a public utility.
Low-Income Housing vs. Condominium ComplexesFinancing
- Low-Income Housing: Funding could come from grants and subsidies aimed at reducing the digital divide.
- Condominiums: Financing could come from the HOA’s capital reserves or a special assessment.
Technology Solutions
- Low-Income Housing: Focus on robust but cost-effective solutions, possibly utilizing existing infrastructure.
- Condominiums: Higher-end solutions like fiber-optic cables can be considered.
User Requirements
- Low-Income Housing: Basic, reliable service would generally be sufficient.
- Condominiums: There may be demands for higher speeds and additional services like bundled TV or home security systems.
Governance
- Low-Income Housing: Would likely be managed by a local authority or non-profit organization in partnership with the housing complex.
- Condominiums: Would likely be managed directly by the HOA or a committee.
Pricing
- Low-Income Housing: Could be subsidized or included as part of government-assisted rent.
- Condominiums: Could be bundled into existing HOA fees.
By adopting a multi-phase, multi-stakeholder approach, and differentiating strategies for low-income housing and condominium complexes, you can aim to restore the Internet as a public commons and advance the cause of digital equity. Would you like to delve deeper into any of these steps or areas?
Sorry, there were no replies found.
Log in to reply.