Forum - Michigan Coalitions - CommunityInternet

Michigan Communities: Digital Equity, Job Creation, and Entrepreneurship

Tagged: CDFIs, community colleges, community organizations, internet service providers, local banks, local economic development agencies, local municipalities, Michigan Department of Education, Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC), Michigan State Government, non-profits, private sector partners, public libraries, venture capital firms

Michigan Coalitions

Michigan Communities: Digital Equity, Job Creation, and Entrepreneurship

Posted by DrRon Suarez on August 26, 2024 at 6:10 pm
Please reply with your comments.

A Community Conversation on Digital Equity, Job Creation, and Entrepreneurship in Michigan should cover a variety of interconnected topics to address the challenges and opportunities in these areas effectively. Here’s a list of key topics to include, along with suggested action points and responsible stakeholders:

Key Topics
1. Digital Equity and Inclusion
  - Current State of Digital Equity in Michigan: Discuss the digital divide, focusing on underserved communities and rural areas.
  - Access to High-Speed Internet: Explore the availability of broadband infrastructure and the need for expansion.
  - Affordability of Internet Services: Examine the cost barriers to accessing reliable internet, particularly for low-income households.
  - Digital Literacy: Address the importance of digital literacy and provide strategies for increasing digital skills among residents.
  - Impact on Education and Healthcare: Discuss how digital inequities affect access to education and telehealth services.
2. Job Creation
  - Technology and Innovation as Job Drivers: Explore how advancements in technology can create new job opportunities in Michigan.
  - Workforce Development and Training: Discuss the need for digital skills training programs to prepare the workforce for the jobs of the future.
  - Support for Small Businesses and Startups: Identify ways to support local entrepreneurs and small businesses in leveraging digital tools for growth.
  - Green Jobs and Sustainable Technology: Explore opportunities for job creation in the renewable energy and sustainability sectors.
3. Entrepreneurship
  - Access to Capital and Resources: Discuss the availability of funding, grants, and resources for startups and entrepreneurs in Michigan.
  - Building a Supportive Ecosystem: Explore the role of incubators, accelerators, and mentorship programs in fostering entrepreneurship.
  - Digital Platforms for Business Growth: Discuss how digital tools and platforms can help local businesses scale and reach new markets.
  - Innovation Hubs and Co-Working Spaces: Highlight the importance of physical and virtual spaces that support collaboration and innovation among entrepreneurs.
4. Policy and Advocacy
  - State and Local Government Initiatives: Discuss current and proposed policies aimed at improving digital equity, job creation, and entrepreneurship.
  - Collaboration Between Public and Private Sectors: Explore partnerships between government, private companies, and non-profits to address these issues.
  - Community-Led Initiatives: Encourage local community involvement in advocating for and implementing digital equity initiatives.
5. Economic Impact and Social Justice
  - Equitable Economic Growth: Discuss strategies to ensure that economic growth through digital and entrepreneurial advancements benefits all communities equitably.
  - Social Justice in the Digital Age: Address the intersection of digital equity and social justice, focusing on marginalized and historically underserved communities.
  - Measuring Success and Accountability: Establish metrics for success and accountability mechanisms to ensure progress is made toward digital equity.
Action Points and Responsible Stakeholders
1. Expand Broadband Access
  - Action: Implement state and local initiatives to expand broadband infrastructure, especially in rural and underserved urban areas.
  - Responsible Stakeholders: Michigan State Government, local municipalities, internet service providers, community organizations.
2. Increase Digital Literacy
  - Action: Develop and fund digital literacy programs targeting all age groups, with a focus on low-income communities and older adults.
  - Responsible Stakeholders: Michigan Department of Education, community colleges, public libraries, non-profits.
3. Support Workforce Development
  - Action: Launch workforce development programs focusing on digital skills, particularly in emerging industries like tech and green energy.
  - Responsible Stakeholders: Michigan Works!, local economic development agencies, community colleges, private sector partners.
4. Facilitate Access to Capital
  - Action: Create or expand grant and loan programs for startups and small businesses, with an emphasis on minority and women-owned businesses.
  - Responsible Stakeholders: Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC), local banks, venture capital firms, community development financial institutions (CDFIs).
5. Promote Entrepreneurship
  - Action: Establish more innovation hubs, co-working spaces, and incubators across Michigan to support local entrepreneurs.
  - Responsible Stakeholders: Local governments, MEDC, universities, business associations.
6. Advocate for Policy Changes
  - Action: Advocate for state and federal policies that support digital equity, such as affordable broadband initiatives and protections against digital redlining.
  - Responsible Stakeholders: Advocacy groups, community organizations, local governments, state legislators.
7. Measure and Report Progress
  - Action: Develop a framework to measure progress on digital equity and economic development initiatives, and regularly report findings to the community.
  - Responsible Stakeholders: State and local governments, research institutions, community organizations.
8. Foster Public-Private Partnerships
  - Action: Establish partnerships between public entities, private companies, and non-profits to leverage resources and expertise in addressing digital equity and fostering economic growth.
  - Responsible Stakeholders: State and local governments, private sector, non-profits, philanthropic organizations.
This comprehensive approach ensures that the conversation is both inclusive and action-oriented, with clear responsibilities assigned to various stakeholders.
DrRon Suarez replied 2 weeks, 6 days ago 1 Member · 1 Reply
1 Reply

DrRon Suarez

Core organizer
August 27, 2024 at 1:30 pm
Questions About Funding Allocation and Prioritization:
1. How does the allocation of BEAD funding toward incumbent ISPs impact the long-term goals of digital equity in Michigan compared to community-owned broadband networks?
  - Follow-up: What mechanisms are in place to ensure that this funding truly benefits underserved communities rather than reinforcing existing disparities?
2. Given that a significant portion of BEAD funding is expected to go to incumbent ISPs, how can communities ensure they retain control over their broadband infrastructure and prevent future monopolization?
  - Follow-up: Are there provisions within BEAD or other funding programs that prioritize community-owned networks over corporate-owned models?
Questions About Sustainability and Community Benefits:
1. What are the long-term economic and social benefits of investing in community-owned broadband networks compared to relying on incumbent ISPs to provide services?
  - Follow-up: How can Michigan leverage these benefits to boost job creation and entrepreneurship within local communities?
2. In what ways do community-owned broadband networks contribute to more resilient and sustainable infrastructure compared to the infrastructure built and maintained by incumbent ISPs?
  - Follow-up: How do these models ensure better accountability and responsiveness to community needs?
Questions About Equity and Access:
1. How do community-owned networks ensure that all residents, especially those in rural and underserved areas, have equitable access to high-speed internet compared to the coverage provided by incumbent ISPs?
  - Follow-up: What strategies can Michigan employ to support the development of these community networks to close the digital divide?
2. With the end of programs like the Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP), what role can community-owned networks play in ensuring continued affordability and access to broadband for low-income households?
  - Follow-up: How does this compare to the approach taken by large ISPs receiving BEAD funding?
Questions About Innovation and Local Control:
1. How can community-owned networks in Michigan foster innovation and entrepreneurship in ways that might be limited under the control of incumbent ISPs?
  - Follow-up: Can you share examples from other states or regions where community ownership has led to significant technological or economic advancements?
2. What are the potential risks and challenges of relying heavily on incumbent ISPs for broadband expansion, and how might community-owned networks mitigate these risks?
  - Follow-up: What safeguards are necessary to ensure community networks are viable and competitive?
Questions About Policy and Advocacy:
1. What steps can local governments and communities in Michigan take to advocate for more equitable distribution of BEAD funding, ensuring it supports community-owned initiatives?
  - Follow-up: How can communities navigate state-level legal barriers that may inhibit the development of municipal broadband?
2. How does the community’s involvement in decision-making differ between community-owned broadband initiatives and projects led by incumbent ISPs receiving federal funding?
  - Follow-up: How can Michigan’s communities ensure that their voices are heard in the planning and implementation of broadband projects?
These questions aim to highlight the differences in approach between community-owned networks and incumbent ISPs, emphasizing the potential for greater equity, local control, and long-term benefits with the former. They also encourage discussion about how policy and funding decisions can support or hinder these outcomes.