Bruce Kushnick
MemberForum Replies Created
-
Bruce Kushnick
MemberDecember 1, 2023 at 5:05 pm in reply to: New Jersey docs and links to the book pdfsWas the spreadsheet OK?
I think this stuff is interesting… but i have to stick the plan I laid out — and not get distracted with other projects — like the workshop — for now.
So, i’ll decline to meet with althea, etc — for now.
by dec 5-8, i have to do at least 3 state filings — and getting the AI stuff up and running enough to use it in these filings – is all I care about
we are also filing with the FTC over hidden fees, and chuck is editing that, and the FCC about the broadband advanced networks reports, section 706 —
And the alternative path stuff I mentioned — and the… etc..
So, doing the AI on NJ — — and that if it works,– we do the other states and MICHIGAN and then do PR for what we just did …
The IRREGULATORS, “Advocates, Telecom Analysts, forensic auditors, lawyers and programmers are now one of the first to use the new AI tools to defend the public interest — or something like that.
So, not interested in workshops, etc untill we do this next step and see what happens.
I’m not saying your idea is bad– but I’ don’t have cycles to pull off the larger picture — and because the 5 year plans are now DUE — we have one opportunity to take this current shot — with the books.
So, Dissconnected and the New Jersey 5 year plan, with our filing included — would be a great start to see what we have — And the filing date is Dec 8– the NTIA schedule for NJ was wrong. — but we filed.
i’m working on the filings all weekend… i’ll go through the AI stuff to see if I can figure it out as well.
and I’m closing the spreadsheet for NJ — with the links.
-
Bruce Kushnick
MemberNovember 30, 2023 at 3:09 pm in reply to: Comparing Irregulators Info to Technology Policy Institute via Chat GPTwe’re playing the hand — Gigi is a separate item, as is PK, as is what we’re doing to get them to play with us in general–
So, after i file — etc – let’s talk about options —
but the first is not to pitch gigi or harold on tech updates… we need to show them what it does
this is about getting them to play with us on the accounting, and the failed deployments, etc — and because it’s tied to a school year — as sascha and chuck are pulling these strings —
the next step should be — we file using the AI ij the next round — and use it for PR — and then whether we meet about the 5 year plans with an alternative we’re creating — and
then get these other people to sign on to that —
and then — oh by the way– did you see our AI filings, etc — we can help you — blah
but tech is not the first step– it’s we prove we have it –and can show it
-
Bruce Kushnick
MemberNovember 30, 2023 at 1:56 pm in reply to: Comparing Irregulators Info to Technology Policy Institute via Chat GPTi just replied and it didn’t post — probably human error —
1) first — I spoke to Chuck — monetize — would you like us to create a package to pitch, say Public Knowledge or others who have databases, filings, etc — and you would get paid to build their stuff.?
2) I’m closing up the NJ filing — due at 5PM
So if you have any time, the stuff I sent about jersey in the last email had the last version of what we’re filing
the TPI stuff is crazy — because it shows that if a reporter asks the same question — they’ll see these guys are clueless about basic facts
and this is what will happen if we do the 5 year plans and our workl including the filings we did in the other states — MA, NY and RI are due next week —